juillet 2011
Two days at Wimbledon: Day Two
Wednesday, 6.30 am. No such luck today. Andy Murray, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal are playing and the quest for tickets for Centre Court has already started the day before. I’m not mentioning Novak Djokovic here, although he was playing too (against the new Aussie hot shot Bernard Tomic as a matter of fact) because the Serb is far from reaching Roger and Rafa’s popularity here (yet). His winning the trophy this year might help though. So back to queuing. The Aussie fanatics supporting Tomic are here as every other day. They’re interviewed by a TV station and asked to demonstrate their fervor: “Let’s go Bernie, let’s go !” We start the process as number 2093 today, which means that getting tickets for one of the show courts would be nothing less than a miracle. As expected, we “only” get tickets for the grounds today but that’s good too, for two reasons: first, it saves money because Centre Court tickets were £90 on day 9 whereas ground tickets were only £17 and second, we’re in for the whole Wimbledon experience: a sunny day after rain and the rest of the grounds after the heart of the Temple.
It all starts with Federer’s warm up on court 14 under Severin Lüthi’s supervision. The place is packed and I’m not the only one taking pictures ! It is then time to move to court 18, the now historical site where Isner and Mahut battled for three days and 11 hours last year, because Martina Navratilova is about to come out to play her invitation’s doubles. Again, the place is cramped. We’re notified that if we go to the bathroom (sorry, to the loo) after the fifteen minutes allowed before the match starts, our seat won’t be saved for us. People are queuing outside in case someone was to abandon their spot. Our neighbor, a pure Londoner judging by his accent and his heavy cider drinking, is what we might call the life and soul of the party, the pre-match entertainment in a way. He’s not willing to attract the attention of the weird guy with a pink hat in the front rows but if the steward could somehow make sure the blonde girl next to him was aware the bloke (let’s be English for once) was single and interested, it’d be awesome. Speaking of single, whenever someone new tries and find a spot in the stands, the steward directs him somewhere, mentioning that a double or a single (seat) is free in such and such row. Inevitably, when the patient steward tells someone that “a short-legged single” is free in our row, our new buddy retorts “hey ! I don’t have short legs !” I think you got the picture by now. Navratilova and Novotna, in the meantime, beat Sukova and Temesvari in straight sets in a match played on a slow rhythm but still quite impressive for 40 and 50-year-olds. It’s also worth mentioning that “Tiger Tim” (Tim Henman for those unfamiliar with the heroic subject of Her Majesty who tried, tried and tried again to win Wimbledon, stopped four times in the semis by Sampras twice, Ivanisevic and Hewitt) makes an appearance on the press terrace above court 18 at some point, duly noted by an observant spectator (“Come on Tim !”) and then obviously by the entire audience.
Time has come to move to the Henman Hill (or Murray Mound since Andy is playing next) to watch Federer vs Tsonga on the giant screen while sipping Pimm’s and eating a toffee ice cream. There are worse venues for a tennis match. Unfortunately, Federer seems to be in a pretty bad day, especially as far as his attitude is concerned. The match starts as it should, Federer building a two-set lead pretty quickly, but then completely losing his grip over the match. More than Tsonga’s performance (as much as the French newspapers tried to emphasize this aspect the next day), Federer looks like he isn’t hungry, he doesn’t want this victory that much, whereas it is obvious that the powerful Frenchman is not here to be taught a lesson by the master and has overcome any complex of inferiority toward the best player of all times. The eternal question is in the air: is Federer too old, is he done ? This question has been asked (too) often since 2008 and the journalists have always been wrong to write off the Swiss maestro so far. But still, this time, maybe for the first time, the attitude is clearly wrong more than the performance and this apparent lack of hunger is worrying indeed. The post-match interview doesn’t reassure anybody since Federer doesn’t seem to take what is supposed to be an excruciatingly painful loss in his own private backyard at Wimbledon too seriously. The crowd is quite taken aback by this massive upset but has no time to mourn since Murray is up next on Centre Court.
Off we go to court 12, where Ivanisevic is scheduled to continue his match started the day before. But first, Arnaud Clément and Lukas Dlouhy are facing Robert Lindstedt and Horia Tecau in a tight fifth set. The Swedish-Romanian pair finally wins 12-10 and will go on to the final, lost to the Bryan twins. Their communication system is the highlight of their game, as you can see on the picture above. Finally, Ivanisevic and his three buddies are back on court and even though court 12 doesn’t seem to be as good a scene as Centre Court to Goran’s taste, this is still great fun to watch. Johnson and Palmer eventually prevail 7-6 7-5. After a little autograph session, it’s time to leave the grounds. This is how Wimbledon, day two, ends and believe me, it was every bit as good as day one ! If I may add a little lesson taught by these two days, although doubles implies less physical effort than singles, this form of the game should not be dismissed as unimportant and TV channels should follow BBC’s lead and broadcast more of them, at least during the main events like the Grand Slams, it’s really fun to watch ! And it’s a part without which the greatest game there is would not be whole.





















