A TV review – La Casa de Papel

Festival_de_cinema_de_Sitges_2018_283130514140829_28cropped229

Or ‘Money Heist’ in English. I know, hard to imagine a more tautological translation (sic) of the original title. But we’ll get back to clichés later. After watching the heist movie of the decade (Widows) and getting nagged by literally everyone, from friends to students, raving about ‘La Casa de Papel’ for months, I finally gave in. Why wait so long you ask? Well, ‘Game of Thrones’ (1 episode and  5 6 4 7 3 9 3 9 5 7 5 7 5 2  indistinguishable characters raised multiple red flags despite a late nude scene)  and ‘Breaking Bad’ (a season and a half in, bored to death, I asked a friend if the thrilling bit he was talking about was really that chemistry teacher running a meth lab), two mainstream favorites, weren’t exactly my cup of tea, so I started growing a little suspicious of massive crowdpleasers. This one is a no-brainer though, even for skeptics like me.

Criminal mastermind El Profesor (Alvaro Morte) has decided to become a Robin Hood of sorts, in other words a noble rebel or a resistant in the same vein as his grandfather who used to sing Bella Ciao while fighting fascism in Italy. Except this time we’re not exactly sure what the resistants’ struggle is all about. Capitalism? The system that has turned El Profesor’s accomplices into convicted felons? Is it just some sort of delusion of grandeur? Maybe all of the above. No matter what his true motives are, El Profesor trains and subsequently sends his eclectic – and frankly odd – gang into the Royal Mint of Spain (Fábrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre, hence the title ‘The House of Paper’) to carry out the robbery of the century – without shedding a single drop of blood or technically stealing anyone’s money. They have two things in common: they have nothing left to lose and each of them has a particular skill set justifying their selection. Tokio (Ursula Corberó, the token hottie doubling up as the voice-over narrator), her boyfriend/gigolo Rio (Miguel Herrán, Henri Laaksonen lookalike and customary good guy who has no reason to be involved other than being tricked into helping the hostages or making a deal with the powers that be), Berlin (Pedro Alonso, the creepy preacher-like psycho running the show on site), Nairobi (Alba Flores, not as fierce as she seems, probably the most engaging of the bunch), Denver (Jaime Menéndez, the proverbial good-hearted idiot who wouldn’t be able to perform the tiniest smart thing to save his life), his dad Moscú (Paco Tous, we almost forget he’s supposed to be a criminal in the course of the show) Helsinki and Oslo (Darko Peric and Radko Dragic, the archetypal good giants whose Serbian origins are responsible for their broken Spanish and their battlefield brotherhood – two heavily armed upgrades on Lennie Small if you will) form an unlikely team that is reminiscent of the drilling crew put together by Bruce Willis in Armageddon to save the planet from an asteroid. Only Stockholm seems to be missing from this list of code names but I guess the joke would have been slightly too obvious in a hostage situation… No decent writer would fall for such bad taste, right?

You might have noticed my using the words ‘token’, ‘customary’, ‘proverbial’ and ‘archetypal’. This show’s use of devices that have been exploited ad nauseam by the heist genre could have been its fatal flaw and yet it is its greatest strength. Indeed, Alex Pina (the show’s creator) seems to be fully aware of the fact that he’s been using a second-hand bag of tricks. Berlin and Tokio’s allusions to hackneyed horror movie clichés when addressing Arturo Román and Mónica Gaztambide (Enrique Arce and Esther Acebo, two of the 67 hostages) can hardly be a coincidence. And since El Profesor seems to be a movie buff too, his ability to shrug off all the authorities’ textbook moves is a redeeming quality in itself.

Last but not least, a hidden gem lurks in the vicinity of the main action. Raquel Murillo (Itziar Ituño), the officer in charge of the case, is so desperately human that she doesn’t seem entirely believable as a character (and she should definitely be out of a job). She was repeatedly assaulted by her ex-husband who happens to be one of her colleagues, no one believes her including her mother and daughter, she was instrumental in another colleague’s cheating on his wife, her mother suffers from dementia and has to write every basic piece of information including where she lives on post-it notes, the whole nine yards. Not many fully functioning human beings would be able to cope with such a comprehensive list of blemishes. Regardless of the ones I’m not disclosing in this review to avoid unnecessary spoilers. All these personal matters end up permeating her job environment, therefore making her extremely incompetent and incredibly likeable at first, unbelievably annoying then, and mostly entertaining on the whole. This brings some balance to the plot, as none of the other law enforcement officers – with the notable exception of Angel (Fernando Soto) – seem to be worth warming up to. Once again, the show manages to successfully turn a seemingly serious weakness into a crucial feature (although feminists and the Spanish police might beg to differ).

I’ll end this with one last stereotypical catch phrase. There’s much more to ‘La Casa de Papel’ than meets the eye. Yes, this show is about so much more than rebellious losers who don’t even know each other’s real names trying to lay their hands on 2.4 billion euros. It’s about their true personal motives since they don’t have a clue what El Profesor’s are. It’s about human (robbers and hostages alike) relationships in confinement. Everyone gets tested. Good, evil, love, leadership, blood, gender, rational thinking, passion, democracy, rules, religion, money as a paper fiction. Everything gets challenged. So now that Christmas is (finally) over, don’t be a Grinch, turn on Netflix and watch the most unrelentingly riveting show since Prison Break’s first season thirteen years ago (too bad they’re about to make the same mistake as the aforementioned show by coming up with a third season about the aftermath of the heist/break). Make sure the floor beneath you is soft because you’ll see that the edge of your seat won’t seem quite close enough to the screen at times. You might also want to warn your neighbors who are trying to enjoy a good old lie-in next door because I dare you not to scream at your screen from time to time. Oh and I don’t think I’d be crossing the Rubicon of human decency if I asked you to watch this show in its (subtitled) Spanish original version. Otherwise you’ll miss an opportunity to tell your friends about the cast’s truly brilliant acting as well as fail to learn some very colorful ways of expressing yourself in Spanish. Dubbing shouldn’t even exist, joder!

P.S. Just let me know who you’re rooting for at the end, the robbers or the police. I still haven’t figured it out. That’s the usual problem with non-Manichaean shows. In the meantime, I’m going to bed. Binge watching 22 episodes (new personal best) in the span of three days is almost as exhausting as a Christmas family dinner.

Picture: Moritz Barcelona, Festival de Cinema de Sitges 2018, 5 October 2018, Licensed under the Wikimedia Creative Commons 2.0 Generic License. Originally published on Flickr https://flickr.com/photos/54838423@N07/31305141408

A movie review – A Simple Favo(u)r

800px-anna_kendrick_and_blake_lively

Hi moms!

Just kidding. I’m allowed since this is literally a meta blog entry. I’m updating this article while reading the book (yes, this movie is an adaptation, how shocking!) in which many chapters are Stephanie’s blog entries (the movie has turned them into vlog entries but kept her signature “hi moms!”). Let me stop you right there. Yes, Darcey Bell has clearly jumped on the Gone Girl bandwagon, like Paula Hawkins (The Girl on the Train) with her wife-missing-husband-grieving-multiple-narrators-novel. Yes, the novel is aggressively bad and getting through it cover to cover was nothing short of an ordeal but I believe there is much more to it than meets the eye. Starting with the movie version.

Anyway. Here goes.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Yes, apparently they spell “favor” with an additional “u” here. “Here” is Cineworld Glasgow, Scotland, where your movie ticket costs a staggering £11 (and there I was, enjoying a vacation from Swiss prices, or so I thought). For such a fee you can probably buy the whole alphabet and rename every letter. I know, I had 5 floors, all the way up to Screen 12, one floor short of the VIP experience room, to think of a decent joke to make about such a massive ripoff and I failed to deliver. However, I had enough time to debrief and mentally write this review on my way down. Sitting through the credits on my own – it turns out local moviegoers tend not to linger – had enabled me to get my heart rate and blood pressure back to a human level so that walking could be envisioned again.

Yup, this thing is intense. My hotel is a mere two blocks from the movie theater so I wasn’t able to stop shaking before reaching my third floor room. I’ve just triple checked that my door is locked. I have the hotel reception and the cops on speed dial. Honestly, I can’t remember watching something this forked up (yes, trying to avoid profanity, The Good Place style, I wouldn’t be able to take it in my current state) in a long time. Comedy, thriller and pseudo horror rolled into one and twisted for good measure. The creepiest most sordid details share the spotlight with sheer brilliance and comic relief.

This is all set up by a trailer so misleading that it’s pure genius. Literally every ingredient is missing. None – and I mean nothing, squat, nada – of the highlights of the plot are included and yet it somehow triggers your polite interest. Well worth the risk of losing a few jaded couch potatoes – and let’s face it, regular Scottish people who can’t afford to add a third mortgage on their house to go to Moneyworld – in my humble viewer’s opinion. This trailer void is the reason why I’ll stop here – at nothing – as far as the basic scenario is concerned.

Equally misleading – and something I can definitely mention without spoiling the movie for you – is the cast. Blake Lively (Emily) is so stereotypically tall, beautiful, perfectly toothed and usually typecast (Gossip Girl, need I say more?) that her acting skills just blew me away. And this gig is no rom-com, I can tell you that. Besides, I was once told that good acting meant seeing an actor in two separate contexts without constantly thinking “hey that’s *insert character name* from *insert movie / TV show name*”. Well, Anna Kendrick pulled that off within one and the same movie by seamlessly evolving from a nerdy character to its polar opposite in the span of 117 minutes. Henry Golding (Sean) and Linda Cardellini (Diana) of ER fame (channel your inner old fart or google that prehistoric show) hold their own as supporting characters without being as stellar as their lead counterparts among an overall solid cast.

The final touch of this masterpiece is brought by an almost all-French soundtrack that will give history buffs an academic boner with a direct reference to and semi reenactment of Jesse James’s death while the final seconds of the movie will make most French speakers dizzy (try reading an English epilogue and listening to French rap at the same time). If you’re really not sure what I’m talking about but are definitely intrigued, you’ve got yourself a heck of a movie (still not cursing) to look forward to. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to call my bank because I’m planning on watching two more movies at Priceyworld this week.

Picture: MTV International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)

Yet another dusty thing from 2010 I’ve recently unearthed. A movie review – Shutter Island

What if my whole universe turned out to be a delusion ? Is it possible that the good person I think I am has always been a big fat lie ? Does this all really exist or is it only a giant hallucination ? This is the kind of questions you ask yourself when the ending credits appear on the screen. When Martin Scorsese (Taxi Driver, Goodfellas, Casino, The Departed to name but a few) works on a novel by Dennis Lehane (Mystic River, Gone Baby Gone), the result is bound to be explosive. And Shutter Island doesn’t disappoint.

Let’s rewind. Shutter Island, Ashecliff Hospital for the so-called criminally insane, 1954. US Marshal Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his partner Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo) set foot on this island, which is not exactly the ideal holiday destination, in order to find a missing patient, Rachel Solando (Emily Mortimer). However, we quickly understand that Teddy’s real aim has nothing to do with that particular investigation and that Dr Cawley (Ben Kingsley) is hiding what’s really going on (or not going on, for that matter). The original (wo)manhunt turns into a quest of the self, a desperate search for sanity in an insane world. A world where the real lunatics are not necessarily easy to find once we’ve gone beyond the obvious. In the end, the concepts of truth, reality and identity have become blurry at best. Just when you thought Lost was the best a director could do with an island…

In a perfect horror movie setting (a bit too much so, as a matter of fact… What are the odds of a storm destroying all communication devices on an isolated island full of dangerous maniacs and surrounded by deadly cliffs ? Please.) vaguely reminiscent of Stephen King’s The Shining, Martin Scorsese skillfully directs his way through a highly twisted plot with the help of his now usual accomplice Leonardo DiCaprio (their fourth collaboration after Gangs of New York, The Aviator and The Departed), as brilliant and troublesome as ever since he reached the grown-up stage (I’m talking about the post-Titanic period) in his interpretation of a tortured widower scarred by what he discovered in the Dachau concentration camp and his wife Dolores (Michelle Williams)’s death. Through the eyes of its main character, the movie oscillates between nightmares and reality until we can no longer tell them apart. The only thing remaining in the end is that once you’re considered out of your mind, it’s forever and no one will ever listen to you again. Even the viewers will eventually doubt your word in their cozy movie theater seats. But don’t take my… word for it, go watch it !

Article published in MUSE in April 2010.

Picture: By Siebbi (Leonardo DiCaprio) [CC-BY-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)%5D, via Wikimedia Commons